Institute of Medicine & Law

When delay wasn’t negligence — Even though the patient didn’t survive

When delay wasn’t negligence — Even though the patient didn’t survive

He was a 74-year-old retired doctor. One night, he slipped and hit his head.

By 2 AM, he was admitted to a hospital and his cut was stitched — but no CT scan was done. He stayed under observation. The scan happened 6 hours later, by which time a subdural haematoma was discovered. He was shifted, operated on, ventilated… and died the next day.

The family alleged medical negligence: the CT scan was delayed, the surgery was delayed, consent was not taken properly.

But the court disagreed.

Multiple expert panels — including the State Medical Council, an Ethics Committee, a Health Directorate enquiry, and neurosurgery professors — reviewed the case. All of them concluded: while there were delays, they were not medically negligent.

The patient was elderly, had chronic conditions (COPD, hypertension, diabetes), and was on antiplatelet medication. A rushed intervention, they felt, might have worsened the outcome.

The court accepted this explanation.

Every death is a tragedy. But not every delay is negligence.

Archives

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Empty CartYour cart is emptyReturn to Shop

    Thank you for sharing your views. Your contribution is important in shaping deliberations at the next Convention and will be carefully reviewed. We will contact you if we need any further information or clarification.