Back Issues
Five surgeries yet no relief! Court accepts surgeons’ defence of “normal physiological phenomenon” to explain post-surgery complications
19MLCD (j273)
- Som Nath @ Kapil v/s Satguru Partap Hospital & Ors.
- Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh
Judgement in favour of:
Doctor
Too eager to complain! A premature complaint filed even before the usual recovery period dismissed by court
19MLCD (j280)
- Ritesh Kumar v/s Bariana Eye Hospital & Lasik Laser Center & Anr.
- Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh
Judgement in favour of:
Doctor
Beyond doctors – Qualifications of paramedics / technical staff could also result in legal liability
19MLCD (j285)
- Kousik Pal v/s B. M. Birla Heart Research Centre & Ors.
- Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of:
Patient
Is a doctor obliged to repeat advice that the patient has already ignored? No, clarifies court
19MLCD (j239)
- Dr. Anita Panwar & Anr. v/s Meena & Anr.
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of:
Patient
Air ambulance service held deficient in service for unfulfilled promises
19MLCD (j245)
- Tajinder Singh v/s Air Rescuers Worldwide Private Limited
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of:
Patient
Foul play or “ordinary course”? "Overwriting" in medical records "may perhaps indicate the subsequent changes" holds court
19MLCD (j252)
- Sarla Devi v/s Northern Railway Central Hospital & Ors.
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of:
Doctor
“Proper management protocol” post-surgery helps quash criminal charges in a Gossypiboma case
19MLCD (j265)
- Venkateshwar Hospital & Anr. v/s State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
- Delhi High Court, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of:
Patient
International memberships / training sufficient to practice in that speciality holds court - A questionable proposition
19MLCD (j271)
- Pijush Kanti Bhowal v/s Fortis Hospital & Anr.
- West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata
Judgement in favour of:
Doctor
Substituting a paediatrician with a BAMS doctor / teleconsultation in an infant’s emergency care – Hospital penalized for this JUGAD
19MLCD (j191)
- Rainbow Hospital v/s Ravinder Verma
- Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula
Judgement in favour of:
Patient
Red flag in court – Changing ink / handwriting while writing medical records held as negligence
19MLCD (j194)
- Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital & Anr. v/s Kumari Swechha Kothari & Ors.
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of:
Patient
Know Your Journal
Key Features
Publishes ‘real time judgments’ on medical negligence from higher courts
Every judgment is further summarized in simple, non-legal language
Comprehensively guides a doctor on avoiding MedLegal issues
Suggests practically useful ‘Do’s & Don’ts’ in day-to-day practice
