Institute of Medicine & Law | Expert in Medical Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it legally mandatory to disclose the cost of surgery / treatment in consent form?

Disclosing the cost of a surgery / treatment in the consent form that is signed by the patient is not legally mandatory. However, being a poor nation, with most of the patients not having health insurance and healthcare becoming expensive with every passing day, there is no harm in disclosing and recording this fact in the consent form. In fact it is a good practice.

Avoid if the patient is above 12 years of age although there is no legal prohibition as a minor is legally incompetent to give or withhold consent for treatment or telemedicine

Health related information of an adult, conscious and oriented patient should not be disclosed to anyone without patients’ positive assent or directions. In case the patient is legally incompetent, information can be shared with near relatives. Sharing information on telephone must be avoided as far as possible unless the patient has given express directions in this regard.

There are two options. Either refuse outrightly or examine the patient properly, get the requisite investigations done and then issue an appropriate certificate.

There is no bar on the length of time for which tele-consultations can be done for follow-up or even otherwise. One simply has to be careful in prescribing medicines, as some medicines can be prescribed only in case of ‘follow up consult’ and not ‘first consult’. A new patient, a patient coming after 6 months of physical consultations or a patient coming for a different condition / symptom is considered as ‘first consult’. Rest all are ‘follow up’ consult.

Yes. Rather in India, it is only the senior consultant who will be legally liable. Checking the notes taken by juniors, residents and/or nurses and then putting initials is a legally and therapeutically safer option

Currently, none of these concepts are legally acceptable in India. Only ‘Advance Medical Directive’ of the patient is legally valid although the procedure prescribed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court for making one and acting / executing the same is very cumbersome, nearly impossible.

In an elective surgery if post-surgery ICU is indicated, the doctor/hospital may have to continue care even without fees. But providing optimum care to such a patient beyond a particular period of time may not be possible. Referring such patients to government / charitable hospitals for surgery at the outset is a better option for both, the patient as well as the doctor.

There is no prohibition or special provisions for psychiatric patients, new or old, in the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines. But examining and interacting with such patients physically is always advisable, moreover in case of new patients.

The legal liability of surgeons and anesthetists is distinct. An anesthetist will be held liable only if there is any negligence in administering anesthesia or failure to perform a pre-anesthesia check-up. All other responsibilities are on the surgeon performing the surgery.

Any qualified doctor, even a simple MBBS, is bound to accept and manage a patient who is in need of emergency care. Every hospital / nursing home irrespective of its size can provide first aid, try to stabilize the patient and then shift to another facility. Writing "Emergency services are not available" or not accepting any emergency patient is illegal and unethical.

Doctors / hospitals are expected to take the requisite precautions in servicing the equipment at the indicated intervals and using them appropriately. Failure to do so could be construed as negligence. But inspite of all precautions if the equipment suddenly fails to work properly, the doctor / hospital is not negligent. The requisite evidence will have to be produced before the court.

The hospital and/or nurse only will be held legally liable. The consultant will not be held negligent. But proving this aspect in court is a Herculean task. There are other practical difficulties also.

As far as telemedicine is concerned, the law is absolutely clear. If the doctor has performed due diligence before engaging these services and has no role to play in data leakage, the doctor is not liable. But the law is not clearly set out in other areas of operations..

Legally speaking, it should be the name registered with NMC. A middle way could be writing both names, especially if the doctor is known by some other name (common name) in the society.

Indian courts are aware of the handicaps that doctors / hospitals face in providing healthcare services. This is clearly reflected in their judgments although aberrations do happen.

No. However, doing so is always advisable in view of the rising numbers of medical negligence cases.

Telemedicine Practice Guidelines 2020 to a certain extent protects doctors if there is any breach of confidentiality or data if the doctor is not directly involved. Nevertheless, it also mandates that the doctor must perform due diligence before opting for any such service..

No. This is legally not permitted. Furthermore, every hospital / nursing home run by a qualified doctor is competent to provide first aid and can facilitate a patient in need of emergency care in reaching the right hospital..

There is no legal bar in India to do so.

Advance consent can be taken for those surgeries / interventions that are commonly performed along with or are an extension of the main surgery / procedure.

Legally, you must refuse to give a Death Certificate, if you are not aware of the cause of death. On the practical side if you are unable to withstand force, give the Death Certificate but at the first opportunity lodge a complaint with the police.

This fact must be specifically recorded in the medical records of the patient.

Yes. And if the patient refuses to do so the doctor can very well stop the telemedicine session midway.

Yes. In fact, they are very accommodating with government doctors / hospitals.

Malfunctioning is not per se negligence. But when a patient is admitted or taken for an intervention knowing well that the equipment is not functioning properly, courts draw adverse inferences.

Generally, a fitness certificate from a physician is advisable and rather mandatory in critical / complicated cases. It would all depend on the patient’s condition and what medical science and medical practice permits.

All efforts must be done to take consent even in emergencies. But if it is interfering with patient management in anyway, proceeding without consent is acceptable to courts.

There is a possibility of misuse. The best way to deal with this situation is to give a clarification letter rather than changing the Discharge Card.

There is no prohibition on doing so. The law laid down in the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines 2020 must be followed.

Yes certainly. Ignorance of law is no defence in a court of law.

In an elective surgery if post-surgery ICU is indicated, the doctor/hospital may have to continue care even without fees. But providing optimum care to such a patient beyond a particular period of time may not be possible. Referring such patients to government / charitable hospitals for surgery at the outset is a better option for both, the patient as well as the doctor.

It is advisable to obtain consent whenever there is a dilemma about whether to do so. There is no legally reliable resource in India that can be referred to while obtaining consent..

The ‘locality rule’ applies in such situations in favour of doctors / hospitals. However, the communication with the patient / attendants regarding shortcomings must be clear and appropriately documented.

Yes. IRDAI has issued clear instructions to insurance companies in this regard.

Courts generally overlook procedural deficiencies in emergencies. However, diligence and following procedures are necessary even in emergencies.

No. India has no such legal mandate, although this is best practice.

Parents / guardians have the legal right to consent on behalf of minors and not the minors. Law is fairly well settled in this regard.

Generally, the senior doctor alone would be held liable. But nowadays, courts are even holding junior doctors liable.

It is advisable to take consent for each cycle rather than taking a single consent for all the cycles / sessions.

There is no written law or guideline mandating that hospitals accepting and managing foreign patients must employ interpreters. But then, how is one going to communicate with a patient who does not know English or the local language?

This aspect is regulated by the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines, which provide a comprehensive list of medicines that can be and cannot be prescribed.

In an elective surgery if post-surgery ICU is indicated, the doctor/hospital may have to continue care even without fees. But providing optimum care to such a patient beyond a particular period of time may not be possible. Referring such patients to government / charitable hospitals for surgery at the outset is a better option for both, the patient as well as the doctor.

If the information provided by the patient is incomplete and within the doctor's knowledge, the doctor must refrain from proceeding further.

In an elective surgery if post-surgery ICU is indicated, the doctor/hospital may have to continue care even without fees. But providing optimum care to such a patient beyond a particular period of time may not be possible. Referring such patients to government / charitable hospitals for surgery at the outset is a better option for both, the patient as well as the doctor.

Merely because the patient has not responded favorably or has died the doctor cannot be held as negligent.

Consent safeguards the doctor from patients / attendants’ allegations about non-disclosure of relevant information. However, there are other misdemeanours for which the doctor can still be held legally liable.

A doctor can charge fees for giving teleconsultations. It is permissible.

If any right, privilege, or authority is misused, the law is bound to punish. This law applies to one and all. Giving a medical certificate is a privilege given to doctors by law for obvious reasons. But misusing this privilege is bound to invite legal trouble.

Except for the drugs whose prescription is banned under the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines 2020, all other medicines, including psychotropic medications, can be prescribed by telemedicine.

The law is very accommodating toward doctors / hospitals that provide emergency care. However, greater care and caution are required if the patient is legally incompetent.

Advance Medical Directives are now legally recognized in India thanks to the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Common Cause case. However, other end-of-life care instructions, such as DNI / DNR, are unclear.

Such noting / endorsement has no legal sanctity nor provides any legal defence.

No there are no specific provisions to protect doctors who provide healthcare services during a disaster. Nevertheless, general protection operates.

Yes. The Supreme Court laid down the law in this regard way back in 1989. Doctors' / hospitals' first priority should be managing the patient, and the procedural protocols can be completed later.

A doctor can never be held liable for the consequences arising from patients' / attendants' failure to disclose the correct and complete history, intentionally or unintentionally.

Yes. It is permanent and is applicable with the same force even after the COVID-19 pandemic.

No. Writing or giving a physical prescription is not mandatory. A prescription can be typed and even sent in digital format. While giving digital prescriptions the legal stipulations laid down in the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines 2020 must be followed.

Every decision and action of a doctor must be in accordance with medical science and without delay. Death is not a barometer for negligence in law.

Yes. The seniority and clinical experience of the doctors are considered when deciding a case of medical negligence.

No. Courts are judicial bodies, while the NMC is a regulatory and statutory body. However, the orders issued by the NMC on complaints filed by patients against doctors are sometimes considered by the courts when determining cases of medical negligence.

Making intraoperative changes and extending the surgery beyond what was agreed upon in the consent is not legally permissible under ordinary circumstances. It is permitted only when the life or limb of the patient is at stake, and postponing the extended action may cause permanent harm to the patient.

It will all depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. If the hospital or doctors have acted in accordance with accepted medical practice without any delay, then they are not negligent, regardless of whether they were successful in reaching a final diagnosis.

The legally safest way is to inform the police in case of poisoning, although it may not always be possible or pragmatic.

Medical records for inpatient (IPD) patients must be preserved by law “for a period of 3 years from the date of commencement of the treatment.” There is no legal requirement to keep medical records for outpatient (OPD) patients, although it is recommended to do so.

Documenting the complaints, symptoms, and history provided by the infant’s mother serves as a full defense in a court of law if something goes awry.

It does not matter whether the patient is an inpatient (IPD) or outpatient (OPD) when it comes to obtaining consent. In India, written informed consent from the patient is essential for all invasive interventions.

In some states of India, laws provide fixed reimbursement for hospitals and doctors who treat emergency patients.

No. The doctor has the right to accept or refuse a patient without providing a reason. It is a contract between two consenting adults. However, the doctor is obligated to accept every patient who is in need of emergency care.

Why not? But the patient attendants must be informed of the time allotted in advance.

The doctor has the right and the discretion to stop the telemedicine consultation midway.

Not in ordinary situation. But in a pandemic or a disaster the government does have the power to do so.

It will depend on the patient’s condition. Appropriate members of the medical team including nurses, junior doctors or even the senior consultants must accompany the patient in the ambulance in suitable cases.

Once the patient / attendants have taken DAMA / LAMA, the legal relationship between the hospital and the patient comes to an end. The hospital cannot be forced to provide an ambulance for transfer.

Yes. Even in such cases, the patient has the right to get medical records. The doctors / hospitals who are targeted in the violence have the legal remedy of filing police complaints.

The minimum requirements of equipments in ICU are prescribed in the Rules made under the Clinical Establishment Act. Only some States have accepted and implemented this law.<