Skip to main content

Institute of Medicine & Law

Back Issues

Stabilizing the patient before referring to higher centre, not negligence

February 1, 2025

The patient was traveling in train from Delhi to Kolkata. She suddenly developed rashes on her skin, high fever, headache, had several bouts of vomiting. She consulted the doctor at the hospital.

Several tests, including blood test, were performed. Patient platelet count was extremely low; hence platelets were transfused. Initially, dengue was suspected but after the results reported negative for dengue, a dermatologist was consulted who suspected toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

After nine days, the patient was referred to another hospital where she received treatment for a month or so.

Only specialists or can MD doctors too be ICU in-charge? Court clarifies…

February 1, 2025

Many patients / attendants request medical care by specialist of the relevant ailment, and they are right in asking for it. However, is it needed for specialists or super-specialist to be at the helm of critical care units as well? This case aptly answers this question.

The patient, a known case of osteoporosis, diabetes and hypertension was admitted to the hospital with complains of discomfort and uneasiness. He was admitted in ICU under the cardiologist who was directing a MD doctor providing critical care to ICU patients. 

About six hours later, the patient suffered a fatal cardiac arrest and could not be revived.

Not hospital’s fault if insurance company does not reimburse claim on hyper-technical grounds

February 1, 2025

An interesting case was recently reported from a judgement pronounced by the Punjab State Consumer Commission.

The patient accidently fell at home and hence, was admitted to the hospital. Rotator cuff and bankart repair procedures were performed, and an implant was also used. The hospital provided treatment bill which included the implant cost. However, the patient demanded a separate bill for the implant, which the hospital refused.

Four consent forms for different procedures, verbatim to each other – Shocking!

February 1, 2025

The patient was a known case of Wolff-Parkinsons-White (WPW) syndrome. He consulted the hospital where a team of senior doctors, including interventional cardiologists and resident doctors, performed Electrophysiology Study (EPS) along with Radio-Frequency Ablation (RFA).

Complications developed during the procedure; the doctors implanted a temporary pacemaker. A permanent double chamber pacemaker was implanted three days thereafter, which malfunctioned after about three months. Another surgery was performed to implant new leads to the pacemaker.

Different reports of the same biopsy sample? Abysmal!

February 1, 2025

The patient was operated for gall bladder disease. About four months later, she was diagnosed with gall bladder cancer. Soon thereafter, she died.

“Medical science and human efforts fall short sometimes” – National Consumer Commission

February 1, 2025

The patient, suffering from heart ailments, underwent angioplasty procedure performed at the hospital by a senior cardiac surgeon, supported by a team of doctors. During the procedure, unfortunately, coronary artery was perforated. All efforts to seal the perforation were in vain, the patient died after few hours.

Doctor tracking every patient? Impossible

February 1, 2025

The patient’s right eye developed swelling and hence, she consulted general physician. She was referred to an eye surgeon who diagnosed giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC). The patient was prescribed two eye drops.

She followed up with the doctor after three months. The condition of her eye showed little improvement. The eye surgeon advised to discontinue the second eyedrop, and increased the dosage of first one.

Event three months thereafter, the condition of patient’s eye did not improve. The doctor prescribed an oral steroid, advised to discontinue the eyedrop and re-prescribed the first eyedrop. But to no avail.

The patient consulted another eye specialist. Cataract to the extent of 60% in the right eye and 40% in the left eye was diagnosed. She consulted the eye surgeon with this diagnosis; the doctor concurred with the findings.

Stabilizing the patient before referring to higher centre, not negligence

February 1, 2025

The patient was traveling in train from Delhi to Kolkata. She suddenly developed rashes on her skin, high fever, headache, had several bouts of vomiting. She consulted the doctor at the hospital.

Several tests, including blood test, were performed. Patient platelet count was extremely low; hence platelets were transfused. Initially, dengue was suspected but after the results reported negative for dengue, a dermatologist was consulted who suspected toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

After nine days, the patient was referred to another hospital where she received treatment for a month or so.

Only specialists or can MD doctors too be ICU in-charge? Court clarifies…

February 1, 2025

Many patients / attendants request medical care by specialist of the relevant ailment, and they are right in asking for it. However, is it needed for specialists or super-specialist to be at the helm of critical care units as well? This case aptly answers this question.

The patient, a known case of osteoporosis, diabetes and hypertension was admitted to the hospital with complains of discomfort and uneasiness. He was admitted in ICU under the cardiologist who was directing a MD doctor providing critical care to ICU patients. 

About six hours later, the patient suffered a fatal cardiac arrest and could not be revived.

Not hospital’s fault if insurance company does not reimburse claim on hyper-technical grounds

February 1, 2025

An interesting case was recently reported from a judgement pronounced by the Punjab State Consumer Commission.

The patient accidently fell at home and hence, was admitted to the hospital. Rotator cuff and bankart repair procedures were performed, and an implant was also used. The hospital provided treatment bill which included the implant cost. However, the patient demanded a separate bill for the implant, which the hospital refused.
Filters
0
0
Your Cart
Empty CartYour cart is emptyReturn to Shop

“Welcome to the ‘11th National Convention of Medicine & Law 2026’ as a registered delegate. We will keep you informed about the Convention as we move ahead. You will receive the link to attend the Convention, along with the necessary instructions, on Saturday, 26th September 2026.”

“Thank you for sharing your views. Your contribution is important in shaping deliberations at the next Convention and will be carefully reviewed. We will contact you if we need any further information or clarification.”